Donating · 2026-06-01 → 2026-12-01
Civil-rights work, trivially verifiable.
Six months funding open-source axiomatization of federal + MA statutes — Lean4 theorems with LLM-evaluated predicates — plus a redacted-only verification service any reader can run against the public dockets.
Objective
To protect our families and children from the now meticulously documented and clearly manifested overreach and outright violations of constitutionally protected civil rights by our activist courts.
The drive
Protect families and children from now-meticulously-documented overreach by activist courts. Six months funding open-source verification work — Lean4 + LLM predicates over federal + MA code; redacted-only AWS service; public monthly ledger. $5–$50/month; no major-donor tier.
Single channel. Live once Open Source Collective approves the fiscal-sponsorship application (submitted 2026-05-23, under review, decision expected ~2026-05-30..06-08); exact go-live date disclosed in the first weekly digest. The drive's work opens 2026-06-01 regardless.
An earlier plan to also run GitHub Sponsors was dropped at launch (USCA1 Doc 00118452547 § IV); not a prerequisite, may be added later.
Fiscal sponsor
Open Source Collective · OpenCollective · status: submitted 2026-05-23; acknowledged; under review
US-based non-profit fiscal host for open-source projects on the OpenCollective platform; holds donor funds, processes receipts, and disburses against per-bucket expense submissions.
No corporate wrapper: QUANTAPIX, INC. was involuntarily dissolved by the Commonwealth on 2021-12-31; its ~$2,600 revival cost is not drive-funded under any bucket. Fiscal sponsorship needs no MA corporation, bank account, or EIN on the qagents side.
Cross-filed § 1746 affidavit ¶¶ 7–8, 13 (reinforced by the pivot); channel-set reduction from ¶ 6(e) and the OSC application now on the federal record via the 5/27/2026 Supplemental Affidavit (USCA1 Doc 00118452547 / Entry ID 6812935). Drift-checked in audits/2026-05-31-supplemental-affidavit-0527-fold-in.md.
Three promises
- 1
Open-sourced redacted qagents framework
Public repos under github.com/quantapix/* carrying redacted slices of qagents — code, CLAUDE.md conventions, and redacted Claude Code session memory. Refreshed weekly.
Owners:
publishing/ - 2
Federal + Massachusetts code axiomatized
Lean4 theorems with LLM-evaluated predicates covering the USC sections in scope and a started Mass. General Laws set. Every theorem cites legal/uscode/index.json or the MA equivalent.
Owners:
proving/·accounting/·legal/uscode/·legal/macode/ (new) - 3
Running AWS-hosted verification service
Live HTTPS endpoints qnarre.quantapix.com + qresev.quantapix.com accepting redacted complaints / portfolios and streaming verification events over SSE. Redacted input only — no PII ever reaches the servers or any LLM.
Owners:
serving/·verifying/·evaluating/
Four buckets
- Claude Max 20× subscription: The required AI-assistant tier — a Max 5× plan was tried during the pre-drive bridge period and proved inadequate for the token-heavy design and video-production work. See llmCallTiers.
- Midpage Legal MCP (not active at launch): Not active at launch — the two-week introductory free usage was consumed pre-drive; a paid subscription activates only once donor funding covers it. Monthly ledger reports $0 drawn until then.
- AWS billing: Variable; billed as used; reported as actuals in the monthly ledger.
- Federal docketing fees: Variable; itemized per docket in the monthly ledger. The planned sixth cert petition will be fee-paid ($300), not IFP, deferred within its 90-day window until this bucket covers the fee. See federalFeeStrategy.
Carryover within a bucket across months is allowed and disclosed. Cross-bucket movement is not allowed. Excess flows into buckets 3 and 4.
Nominal tiers
$5–$50/month range; no major-donor tier. Tiers are nominal — any amount is welcomed via either channel.
Accountability
A weekly digest every Friday plus a monthly ledger within 5 calendar days of month-end. Inflow by channel, four-bucket outflow with receipts, carryover, and one paragraph of progress per promise.
Two consecutive missed weekly digests OR any missed monthly ledger breaks the *trivially verifiable* contract by its own terms; recovery requires a same-day disclosure note explaining what broke.
Scope & contingencies
The planned sixth pro se cert petition — on a recent Massachusetts Appeals Court Rule 23.0 disposition that expressly redirected the litigant to the Supreme Court — will be filed fee-paid ($300), not IFP, to avoid the noncriminal-IFP bar of Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U.S. 1 (1992). The Sup. Ct. R. 13.1 90-day window runs 2026-05-19..~2026-08-17; the filing is deferred within that window until Bucket 4 covers the fee, or to the practicable maximum within the window.
Contingent, post-drive class-action counsel — post-drive only, outside the four buckets.
Still being formed; requires careful investigation. No counsel identified, no engagement committed.
Privacy floor
Service accepts only redacted documents.
On the federal record
-
U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
No. 26-1346Kifor v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al.
Principal brief Doc 00118432189; status-affidavit chain of 4/27–4/30/2026 (Docs 00118437697, 00118438630, 00118439659 / Entry ID 6805890) on the no-PO-Box manifestations; 5/12/2026 Emergency Motion for Injunction Pending Appeal Doc 00118445745 — the fresh-harm vehicle (5/11/2026 receipt of two state-court decisions mailed to the demolished house) — + cross-filed § 1746 Affidavit on Public-Service Efforts and the Public Donation Drive Doc 00118445747 (Entry ID 6809309), the federal-record wrapper this drive is anchored on; 5/19/2026 Status Affidavit Doc 00118448822 / Entry ID 6810950; 5/27/2026 Supplemental Affidavit Doc 00118452547 / Entry ID 6812935 (fiscal-sponsorship pivot + federal-posture updates); 11-volume Record Appendix
-
U.S. District Court, District of Massachusetts
1:25-cv-11831-AKKifor v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts, et al.
IFP Order 3/25/2026; 3/28/2026 Affidavit of Indigency Doc 32-4; mailing-address affidavit Dkt. 28-9; shelter-address acceptance Dkt. 36 (4/27/2026)
-
Supreme Court of the United States
No. 25-6878Kifor v. Massachusetts
Rule 39.8 dismissal 4/27/2026; the address line of the dismissed petition is itself part of the documented Massachusetts no-PO-Box pattern. A sixth pro se petition (on a recent state appellate disposition) is planned fee-paid, not IFP — see federalFeeStrategy.
Anchors are document IDs on the named dockets — not outbound links. Verify against the public record at the respective clerk's office.
Contact
Drive questions: quantapix@gmail.com. Litigation questions are out of scope — see the dockets and the relevant clerk's office.